Why This Blog was Created & Why No Comments to Postings Are Allowed

Mark Driscoll @ Crystal Cathedral

Originally posted on “Truth Faith Defender” in response to an Anti-Mark Driscoll Comment Troll.

As for Driscoll.

The crux of it is his incorrect conetxualising.

Suss that out. Dig deep into that.

And you will find that Mark has no qualms in meeting the carnal at thier carnality.

It is like a 15 yr old boy telling his parents how they should raise him. Plain and simply it is flat out wrong.

Per my research, it is per gossip that Mark Driscoll meets the carnal in their carnality. Why is it that those that love to attack other Christians by comments on my blog tend to not spell very well? [He claimed in a comment response that he was keyboard challenged but still he could proof-read and correct typing errors before posting.] Mark Driscoll is no 15 year old boy as he is a mature Christian man. The way you spell [or type and post without proofreading]; I ponder if you are a 13 year old claiming to be a man.

As far as the contextualization issue, I have yet to see a good argument against Mark Driscoll on this matter. Based upon the small amount of stuff by Mark Driscoll I have listened to so far; what is the big deal? I have no clue.

It is like those that hate don’t like (i.e. changed at the request of my critic) Mark Driscoll simply have to say that he does poor contextualization or simply he does contextualization, and that is sufficient evidence that Mark Driscoll has no right to be a teaching elder of any real Christian church. Per my discernment to say that Mark Driscoll does contextualization (or anything else) and not give evidence as to why that is wrong makes the person making the charge nothing but a gossip person trying to damage someone’s character.

This posting in response to the troll who keeps posting anti-Mark Driscoll comments on this blog [True Faith Defender] that I now refuse to post since his comments appear to be nothing but gossip advertizing his gossip blog. This blog doesn’t advertize Christian gossip blogs as it loves to expose Christian gossip blogs for their sin of gossiping.

Discerning is vital. Without is you get led astray. Without it you will allow your children to listen to Joel Osteen. Without it you could attend a church that preaches a false gospel and not no it. To speak much of slandering those who discern is silly……….

Absurd in fact. Have you forgotten what time these are? Perilous and difficult. It will get worse…………

If I had any children they would know from the correct spiritual discernment of Mark Driscoll that Joel Osteen is not worth listening too. Discernment that is not gossip is what I want and speaking against so-called discernment blogs that are nothing but a person’s opinions marketed as spiritual discernment equal to the Bible in authority is not slander. If you cannot deal with the truth; then listen to your spiritual discernment guide at _____ as he is a real opinionated bigot claiming to speak in the name of God.  [I will post later why I consider him an opinionated bigot.  It is a posting on my to do list.  That posting when posted is very likely to get a hate response from similar opinionated bigots but this blog doesn’t allow comments.  Since I have yet to make that posting public, the name of the blog has been removed.]

I like “The White Horse Inn” as they appear to give more fair and balanced views on issues in Christendom most of the time. In addition, I like listening to “Issues, Inc.” for the same reason. I am not against spiritual discernment when it is done per what the Bible teaches.