Roman Catholic Pope Joins the Protestant Blogging Popes November 14, 2009
Posted by rzhblog in Religion.Tags: Blogging Popes, Protestant, Roman Catholic
comments closed
The Roman Catholic Pope joins the Blogging Protestant Popes
In an announcement that shocked the Protestant Pope community, the one and only Roman Catholic Pope makes it official that he can blog too!
Robert Morey & FIRE November 7, 2009
Posted by rzhblog in FIRE, Faith Defenders, Robert Morey.Tags: Faith Defenders, FIRE, Robert Morey
comments closed
Originally posted on my “True Faith Defender” blog. I have been trying all day to call the Faith Defenders toll free phone number and all I get is a busy signal. You would think that Faith Defenders doesn’t want to speak to me or anyone else. It appears they have left the phone off the hook?
The Legendary Faith Defenders Building
A copy of the FIRE report on Robert Albert Morey was mailed to me and I have been busy studying it. It fills in some of the missing pieces of the puzzle concerning the purchase and sale of 17601 Fitch Avenue in Irvine, CA. The report appears to end around July 2008; but it confirms evidence I obtained from the California Secretary of State and Orange County Clerk-Recorder offices as being accurate. In addition, the report appears to support some of my assumptions as being accurate.
The report documents the three church splits that occurred at FCC (Faith Community Church). I have a much improved understanding of the church splits at FCC and how these impacted other churches in Orange, Riverside, and Los Angeles counties. I have a much better understanding of the persons impacted along with the Baptist churches impacted. In addition, I have a much better understanding of why FIRE got involved in the matter as it impacted several churches and individuals that were part of FIRE.
Anyone that claims that this report has insufficient evidence that Robert Albert Morey is guilty of sin or breaking California Corporate laws has either not read the report or has no desire to know the truth. The report has more than sufficient evidence that Robert Albert Morey was guilty of sin and FIRE was right in asking him to resign from FIRE.
Some of the information in the report per my research may not be accurate but it doesn’t change the fact that Robert Albert Morey is guilty of sin sufficient to make him unfit to be an elder in charge of any church or parachurch ministry. All charges concerned illegal business practices, and bad ethics and none of the charges concerned false teaching or heresy taught by Robert Albert Morey.
Due to the fact that the report is confidential; I cannot ethically blog about information in the report without getting permission from FIRE first. I may find myself if I request permission to publish information from the report from FIRE having to explain how I got a copy of the report in the first place.
What is strange is the report was mailed to my office and delivered by one of the office staff to me. Frankly the office website doesn’t appear to generate much business other than requests that I apply for a job with another company. I have recuiters for other companies sending me Christmas cards because it appears they expect to talk me into working for another company soon?
Since it was made public by another blog that Robert Morey planned on having a CPA do an audit of the sale of 17601 Fitch Avenue, Irvine, CA I guess it is OK for me to state that it appears that Onisko & Schotz, LLP may have been hired to do that task. Since I do not consider the source of that information in the FIRE report to be a reliable source; I do not know if this fact is really true or part of the Robert Morey smokescreen of mis-information.
Ugly Watchdogs & Drama Queens (Two Not Necessarily Connected?) November 7, 2009
Posted by rzhblog in Online Discernmentalist Mafia, Surph's Side Blog.Tags: Ken Silva - May he never betray Denise like Steve Camp did, Mark Driscoll - Steve Camp's new friend & Denise hates him, Online Spiritual Discernmentalist Mafia, Pope & Drama Queen Denise of Surph's Side blog, Steve Camp - ex-boy friend of Denise of Surph's Side blog, Surph's Side Blog, tim keller
comments closed
Originally posted on “True Faith Defender” in response to “Online Discernmentalist Mafia” and “Surph’s Side” blog. I still ask the question in public of when will “Online Discernmentalist Mafia” write satire on Steve Camp’s ex-girl friend and Ken Silva’s faithful girl friday otherwise known as “Denise of Surph’s Side blog”. Denise’s breakup with Steve Camp over the Mark Driscoll matter has to be one of the greatest Drama Queen events in American Spiritual Discernmentalist history to date. However, Denise tends to be the Drama Queen of Spiritual Discernmentalism.
Frankly, it doesn't look like a picture of me. My only response to "The Online Discernmentalist Mafia" blog. I believe I will find a better watchdog photo for my blog as a result of this photo.
I have recieved a response from Susan Castillo and I am convinced that Denise of Surph’s Side blog is guilty of slander. In addition, Christian Research Network is guilty of spreading slander for not checking the accuracy of gossip posted on Surph’s Side blog. Was it too much for both to check the accuracy of their claimed facts before publishing something on the internet. Neither Surph’s Side blog or Christian Research Network has obeyed the Bible on this matter and are guilty of sin!!!!! REPENT!!!!!
Greetings, Ron,
These are my sole comments on this matter…
Great care was taken during this class to differentiate between that material which was presented to provide historical background/ an understanding of other denominations and that which might be considered appropriate and useful in the context of the Protestant, and particularly the Reformed, community of faith. Anything that was endorsed was biblically based, theologically sound, and in no way violated the spirit of those reflections of Luther as they appeared in the article. For the record, I have never before heard of the DVD of a coincidentally similar title on which I was accused of basing my class.
Sincerely.
Susan Castillo
The blogs that have posted on this matter:
I am considering making this photo the official watchdog photo of my blog.
Sir Aaron Finally Exposes Denise of Surph’s Side Blog as a False Discernmentalist? November 7, 2009
Posted by rzhblog in Biblical Thought blog, Surph's Side Blog.Tags: Biblical Thought blog, Denise, Pope Denise of Surph's Side blog, Surph's Side Blog
comments closed
Originally posted in the “Restoration by Biblical Thought” blog which is the official watchblog of “Biblical Thought”. Every watchblog needs a watchblog as the Bible makes it clear that a true disciple of the LORD Jesus Christ has to test all things which includes watchblogs.
At times I disagree with Sir Aaron and sometimes I totally agree:
For the record, I strongly believe that Denise of Surph’s Side blog does not have the gift of discernment but she does have the gift of gossip. However, the gift of gossip is something all women have so it doesn’t appear to be all that special of a gift.
Apprising Ministries Assumes Rather Than Checking Facts November 7, 2009
Posted by rzhblog in Apprising Ministries blog, Christian Research Network, Ken Silva, Redeemer Presbyterian Church NYC, Surph's Side Blog, tim keller.Tags: Apprising Ministries, Christian Research Network, Redeemer Presbyterian Church, Surph's Side Blog, tim keller
comments closed
The reason why I call “Christian Research Network” the “National Enquirer” of Christianity is that it rarely does any serious research.
This Seeking God: The Way Of The Monk DVD, which we assume formed the basis of what Susan Castillo–who continues “to embrace her ‘inner monk’”–teaches in this regard was produced as an:
examination of the strange life of the Benedictine monks at New Mexico’s Monastery of Christ in the Desert, presents the traditional chants, seasonal rituals,… (Online source)
First item left out of the Apprising Ministries blog posting which this quotation comes from is that Susan Castillo was a college student per my understanding with a temporary assignment at Redeemer Presbyterian Church. She appears to be no longer listed in the Redeemer Presbyterian Church directory so maybe she has returned to college student status. She was not a full-time permanent member of the Redeemer Presbyterian Church staff per my understanding of information from the Redeemer Presbyterian Church website.
Greetings, Ron,
These are my sole comments on this matter…
Great care was taken during this class to differentiate between that material which was presented to provide historical background/ an understanding of other denominations and that which might be considered appropriate and useful in the context of the Protestant, and particularly the Reformed, community of faith. Anything that was endorsed was biblically based, theologically sound, and in no way violated the spirit of those reflections of Luther as they appeared in the article. For the record, I have never before heard of the DVD of a coincidentally similar title on which I was accused of basing my class.
Sincerely.
Susan Castillo
“The Way of the Monk” course was a one time course which is no longer offered by Redeemer Presbyterian Church per the Fall 2009 course schedule.
I continue to be amazed at how many members of the Christian Research Network make assumptions or speculate rather than carefully checking the facts before posting a blog article. Few newspapers in the USA would be so sloppy with the truth as it would soon result in a loss of credibility.
Too much of the time what is published by members of the Christian Research Network is simply gossip that was never checked to see if it was accurate information.
If You Were a True Male Christian Faithful to Jesus; You Wouldn’t Read a Woman’s Spiritual Discernment Blog!!!! November 7, 2009
Posted by rzhblog in Apprising Ministries blog, Ken Silva, Surph's Side Blog.Tags: Appraising Ministries Woman Liberation Agenda Exposed!, Pope Denise of Surph's Side blog, Pope Ken Silva, spiritual discernment
comments closed
All true Spiritual Discernment males know that Ken Silva is in rebellion against God for recommending that men including himself read a Spiritual Discernment blog written by a woman. Apprising Ministries is a false spiritual discernment blog that clearly supports the Woman’s Liberation Movement. Without doubt, Apprising Ministries has the secret agenda of putting a woman pastor in the pulpit of all churches in the USA. It is time that this secret conspiracy is exposed by this spiritual discernment blog so that all true spiritual discernment males will not only stop reading “Surph’s Side” blog but “Apprising Ministries” blog too. 
You have been warned about this matter and if you ignore my warnings then I am not guilty of your sin; therefore your blood in not on my hands come judgment day. May God grant you repentance unto eternal life on this matter.
[This is partly satire and partly not satire .... you go to the Bible and read what Paul has to say on this matter and pray for guidance if you have the guts to question the authority of Pope Ken Silva.]
Why This Blog was Created & Why No Comments to Postings Are Allowed November 6, 2009
Posted by rzhblog in Mark Driscoll.Tags: Mark Driscoll, Anti-Mark Driscoll Comment Trolls
comments closed
- Mark Driscoll @ Crystal Cathedral
Originally posted on “Truth Faith Defender” in response to an Anti-Mark Driscoll Comment Troll.
As for Driscoll.
The crux of it is his incorrect conetxualising.
Suss that out. Dig deep into that.
And you will find that Mark has no qualms in meeting the carnal at thier carnality.
It is like a 15 yr old boy telling his parents how they should raise him. Plain and simply it is flat out wrong.
Per my research, it is per gossip that Mark Driscoll meets the carnal in their carnality. Why is it that those that love to attack other Christians by comments on my blog tend to not spell very well? [He claimed in a comment response that he was keyboard challenged but still he could proof-read and correct typing errors before posting.] Mark Driscoll is no 15 year old boy as he is a mature Christian man. The way you spell [or type and post without proofreading]; I ponder if you are a 13 year old claiming to be a man.
As far as the contextualization issue, I have yet to see a good argument against Mark Driscoll on this matter. Based upon the small amount of stuff by Mark Driscoll I have listened to so far; what is the big deal? I have no clue.
It is like those that hate don’t like (i.e. changed at the request of my critic) Mark Driscoll simply have to say that he does poor contextualization or simply he does contextualization, and that is sufficient evidence that Mark Driscoll has no right to be a teaching elder of any real Christian church. Per my discernment to say that Mark Driscoll does contextualization (or anything else) and not give evidence as to why that is wrong makes the person making the charge nothing but a gossip person trying to damage someone’s character.
This posting in response to the troll who keeps posting anti-Mark Driscoll comments on this blog [True Faith Defender] that I now refuse to post since his comments appear to be nothing but gossip advertizing his gossip blog. This blog doesn’t advertize Christian gossip blogs as it loves to expose Christian gossip blogs for their sin of gossiping.
Discerning is vital. Without is you get led astray. Without it you will allow your children to listen to Joel Osteen. Without it you could attend a church that preaches a false gospel and not no it. To speak much of slandering those who discern is silly……….
Absurd in fact. Have you forgotten what time these are? Perilous and difficult. It will get worse…………
If I had any children they would know from the correct spiritual discernment of Mark Driscoll that Joel Osteen is not worth listening too. Discernment that is not gossip is what I want and speaking against so-called discernment blogs that are nothing but a person’s opinions marketed as spiritual discernment equal to the Bible in authority is not slander. If you cannot deal with the truth; then listen to your spiritual discernment guide at _____ as he is a real opinionated bigot claiming to speak in the name of God. [I will post later why I consider him an opinionated bigot. It is a posting on my to do list. That posting when posted is very likely to get a hate response from similar opinionated bigots but this blog doesn't allow comments. Since I have yet to make that posting public, the name of the blog has been removed.]
I like “The White Horse Inn” as they appear to give more fair and balanced views on issues in Christendom most of the time. In addition, I like listening to “Issues, Inc.” for the same reason. I am not against spiritual discernment when it is done per what the Bible teaches.
Surph’s Side Blog – Modest Dress for Women November 6, 2009
Posted by rzhblog in 27339318, Surph's Side Blog.Tags: Carrie Prejean, Denise, modest clothing, Surph's Side Blog
comments closed
Originally posted on “True Faith Defender” and it is one of the most read postings on that blog. It was a bit off topic for “True Faith Defender” since Denise is more a blind parrot of John MacArthur than Robert Morey. She does occasionally post on Biblical Thought blog mostly to get traffic from that blog to her Surph’s Side blog as best as I can figure out.
Modest Dress
Being tired of Denise of Surph’s Side blog making a big deal of how undressed Carrie Prejean is in her eyes. How much clothing does Carrie Prejean have to wear before she becomes modest? Denise doesn’t define anywhere that I am aware of what is Biblical Thought Modest Woman Clothing. It times I detect that Denise is drifting into the legalism of Islam and any moment I expect to read that Denise has decided to return to Mecca.
Modest Dress 2
All we know is that immodest dress appears in the eyes of Denise to be whatever Carrie Prejean appears to be wearing or not wearing at the moment. Denise’s desire to gossip about Carrie Prejean’s clothing or lack of clothing as if somehow the future of Christianity depends upon Carrie Prejean’s clothing taste is a bit difficult to understand.
Modest Dress 3
As far as Arab dress that Denise would approve as it is assumed she is headed into the faith of Islam on her personal journey to Mecca by expert spiritual discernment monitors who detect Islam growing in her mind because of her obsession with modest clothing. It is assumed that the above clothing would be considered modest. The following photo would be considered not modest in the eyes of Denise of Surph’s Side blog
UnModest Dress
In Response to God’s Self-Appointed Judges of Mark Driscoll’s Sermon @ Crystal Cathedral November 6, 2009
Posted by rzhblog in Mark Driscoll, Robert Schuller.Tags: Mark Driscoll, Crystal Cathedral, Hour of Power, Robert Schuller
comments closed
Mark Driscoll @ Crystal Cathedral
This is a modified posting that originally was posted on my blog “True Faith Defender”. It has been removed from “True Faith Defender” blog and posted here. This posting was in response to Blogging Popes who have attacked Mark Driscoll for either giving a sermon at the Crystal Cathedral at all or not giving the sermon that they believe he should have given.
I was present at Crystal Cathedral and I heard both of Mark Driscoll’s sermons. He gave two different sermons. One for the first service and another for the second service. This is no secret as this fact was made known by both Mark Driscoll and the Crystal Cathedral. As an eye witness to the event whereas the Blogging Popes have only watched the first sermon given because that was the only sermon that “The Hour of Power” broadcasted of the two sermons to date.
Mark Driscoll’s deal was that he was not paid any money even travel expenses for giving two different sermons, both sermons were to be broadcasted on “The Hour of Power” unedited, and he would keep the two sermons within the time alloted so that the sermons would not have to be edited (shortened to fit the time slot). Per his Tweeter feed before going to Southern California to give the sermons he was busy practicing the sermons to make sure he could keep the sermons within the alloted time so that the sermons would not be edited.
When I heard both sermons in my mind was the idea that the first sermon probably would be broadcasted but I wondered if the second sermon would get censored by not being broadcasted. For reasons yet to be explained “The Hour of Power” was slow at broadcasting the first sermon that Mark Driscoll gave at the Crystal Cathedral and all is very silent as to when if ever the second sermon will be broadcasted on “The Hour of Power”.
Why did I think the second sermon may not be broadcasted? It was not because the sermon had any heresy in it. It was because the sermon was too negative for the very positive message typical of “The Hour of Power”. The sermon had to do with the pain that Jesus suffered to pay for the sins of those that he redeemed. The sermon went too much into the negativity of sin and the price that had to be paid by Jesus to make the redeemed right with God. Sin is a very negative topic if preached the way that Mark Driscoll did that morning at the Crystal Cathedral.
To the great Blogging Popes who condemned Mark Driscoll’s first sermon at the Crystal Cathedral which really wasn’t that bad of a sermon as it was part 1 of a 2 part sermon set since it lead up to the second sermon. What will they say if the second sermon get broadcasted because it has yet to be broadcasted many months after it was preached. To me the second sermon was greater than the first sermon and I count my blessings that I was there to hear it since it has yet to be broadcasted.
Although I do question the wisdom of Mark Driscoll calling Robert Schiller a brother I have no desire to condemn him over it. Perhaps I should condemn Martin Luther over not calling a person a Christian brother that he should have?
Although I do question the wisdom of going to the Crystal Cathedral to give two different sermons that were very Christ centered particularly the second one which has yet to be broadcasted on “The Hour of Power”. The reason I questioned the wisdom of it is that I knew his decision to give a sermon there would create a lot of controversy. I knew that the Blogging Popes would attack him on it and condemn him for not saying something that they believed he should have said. After hearing both sermons there in person I am glad that he did it as I was blessed to hear both sermons particularly the second one. The reason I went to see Mark Driscoll is that I have become very impressed with him, I wanted to see him in person, and I knew he was doing something controversal that the Blogging Popes would condemn him on so I wanted to witness this controversal event in person to be a key witness on what really happened that morning at the Crystal Cathedral.
To the Self-Righteous Anti-Mark Driscoll Blogging Popes I have the following questions. Who made you a god over Mark Driscoll!?!?! Who made you judge over Mark Driscoll!?!?! Who made Mark Driscoll accountable to you as to what he preaches and where he preaches? By what authority in the Bible do you judge Mark Driscoll?!?!
In Response to the Silly Argument if You Had Any Spiritual Discernment You Wouldn’t Listen to Mark Driscoll Sermons or Read His Books November 7, 2009
Posted by rzhblog in Mark Driscoll.Tags: Mark Driscoll, Anti-Mark Driscoll Comment Trolls, Hate Trolling for Jesus, God's Faithful Haters of Mark Driscoll, Mark Driscoll is the AntiChrist, If You Had Any Spiritual Discernment
comments closed